Persona · Product teams

KERNSTACK for Product teams

Product teams choose KERNSTACK when the product is the job and the platform is not: one stack.json declares the API, the data, the background work, and the frontend, previews instantiate the same declaration for review, and changes — human- or agent-drafted — ship through a plan the team reads together. The squad keeps the velocity of a startup stack without inheriting a second job as its own platform group.

stack.json IaC Functions (WASM)Approval Workflows Agent Sandboxes

Talk to us Read Technical Documentation → Software Lifecycle Cloud →

Why Product teams outgrow assembled cloud and tool collages

Squads of two to eight builders inside a 50-to-250-person company, shipping a product whose infrastructure was never supposed to become their job.

The whole product in one review

A feature is rarely just code: it is a route, a table change, a background job, an index. On KERNSTACK that feature is one diff and one plan, reviewed in one sitting by the people who will own it at 3 a.m. The context-switch tax of assembled stacks — five consoles to understand one change — is most of what small teams actually pay, and it is the first thing that disappears.

Agents as teammates with a sandbox

The team’s coding agents (Cursor, Claude Code, Codex, Pi, or the project’s @agent) work on agent branches with live demo environments, so agent output joins the same review culture as human output: click the URL, read the plan, approve. Velocity goes up without the review standard quietly becoming “the agent seemed confident”.

Preview targets per branch: reviewers click the real stack, data and workflows included
Background work is a worker and a workflow away, not a new vendor evaluation
Idle environments and side projects cost storage, not a floor of instances

stack.json — Product teams Stack plan · deploy

{
  "stack": { "target": "product.default" },
  "gateway": { "routes": [{ "name": "api", "target": { "kind": "function", "name": "api" } }] },
  "resources": {
    "functions": [{ "name": "api" }],
    "workers": [{ "name": "jobs", "runtime": "nodejs" }],
    "tables": [{ "name": "records", "key_name": "id", "key_type": "S", "indexes": [] }]
  }
}

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

How much platform work does the team still own?

The declarative kind: stack.json, seed data, plan reviews. There is no cluster, queue fleet, or search node to patch; instances, gateways, and index maintenance are the platform’s side of the line. The team operates the product, not the machinery under it.

Can non-backend engineers ship safely?

Safer than the alternative: every change arrives as a plan with creates, updates, and deletes in plain platform language, destructive items refuse without explicit confirmation, and preview targets let anyone click the change before it is real.

What does the team give up versus assembling best-of-breed?

Exotic services and planetary scale, knowingly. For a squad whose product is a business application, the trade buys back the scarcest resource they have — senior attention — every single week.

Connected in the Project Graph

Related capabilities, architectures, and comparisons

Ship your stack on the Software Lifecycle Cloud.

Closed preview on dedicated European infrastructure. Bring a repository or start from a blueprint.

Talk to us See pricing & credits →